Home Page Owners Registry Discussion Forums ProwlerMall Event Scrapbooks About

Click here to return to the Prowler Online Board Main Page
  ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum
  General Prowler Discussion
  Should it have had a V8? (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
edit profile | register | preferences | faq | search

   Bottom of Page
This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Should it have had a V8?
Michael Pond


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Canon City, Colorado
Registered: Jul 2003
Admin Use

posted 12-06-2014 05:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Michael Pond     send a private message to Michael Pond   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Michael Pond
LOVE THAT SOUND(MUSIC)!!
mslc10



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Bulverde, Texas, United States
Registered: Nov 2009
Admin Use

posted 12-10-2014 07:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mslc10     send a private message to mslc10   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by mslc10
Yep that's how it should have sounded..........but I still dig what it is!
Me Time
Prowler Junkie

From: NJ. USA
Registered: Jun 2012
Admin Use

posted 12-12-2014 08:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Me Time     send a private message to Me Time   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Me Time
Back when the Prowler was built the V8's didn't have much more HP so the V6 was the clear answer for many reasons.

It still is IMO, the Prowler isn't meant to be a pure burner but more a touring car with some get up and go.

luch



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Newmarket Ontario Canada
Registered: Nov 2007
Admin Use

posted 12-12-2014 09:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for luch     send a private message to luch   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by luch
yes
drbutton

|

POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Canon City, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2014
Admin Use

posted 12-12-2014 11:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for drbutton     send a private message to drbutton   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by drbutton
I have heard this argument about the V8 and the Prowler for years, long before I bought a Prowler. My vote is for #2, the V6. Guys can bench race all day, but keeping up with the exponential performance arms race of the last 15 years would have overwhelmed the stock Prowlers no matter what Chrysler would have put under the hood. I did not buy mine to race, or impress people with the power. I bought the Prowler for the fine car that it is, and I like driving it more than any of my prior V8 cars.
beachcat



BANNED

From:Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jul 2011
Admin Use

posted 12-13-2014 06:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for beachcat     send a private message to beachcat   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by beachcat
Whenever I hear someone say "nice car but should have had more power" (I hear that a lot!), I always say "have you ever driven one?". The answer is always "NO". Then I say, "well if you had, you likely wouldn't be saying that". I usually get an embarrassed look in return. It's my way of letting them know that they don't have the info they need to say what they are saying.

On the street and off the line, the Prowler has very respectable performance.My buddy has a 625 HP Malibu and he was shocked when we had short challenge, off the line. Unless you go to the track, you can't legally do much more with any car, anyway.

The overwhelming majority on this thread have responded "NO". That's because we have all driven one and we get it. With any car, you have to look at the entire package. All cars can be picked on in some way, including the price tag and value retention. When you look at the whole Prowler package, it's a real winner.

Take the haters for a ride and blow their minds.

ProwlerFanUK
Prowler Enthusiast

From:South Otterington, England
Registered: Jun 2014
Admin Use

posted 12-15-2014 06:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ProwlerFanUK     send a private message to ProwlerFanUK   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by ProwlerFanUK
Yes, of course!!!
padroo



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Chesterton, IN, USA
Registered: Dec 2010
Admin Use

posted 12-15-2014 08:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for padroo     send a private message to padroo   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by padroo
I really can't think of too many cars that people sell and then buy another one just like the one they had. Corvette is likely the most common example though.
alrtg



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Westminster, MD, USA
Registered: Dec 2008
Admin Use

posted 12-15-2014 10:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for alrtg     send a private message to alrtg   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by alrtg
quote:
Originally posted by padroo:
I really can't think of too many cars that people sell and then buy another one just like the one they had. Corvette is likely the most common example though.

For me there have been a few vehicles that I bought, liked, and purchased another one (or more)

Corvair, both early and late model. I have had a dozen or so over the years, still have one and sort of looking for another.

Impala, two '61 Bubble tops, I also had a '65 for about a week then gave it to a friend.

S-10 Pick up, First generation. I am on my third one now and have had it for 18 years. I would consider another if it was the right one.

Lebaron, I have had two of these ('90 & '92 V6 convertibles) and liked them very much. This is another that I would own another of, again if the right one came along.

YELLER CAT


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:FLORIDA, USA
Registered: Jun 2012
Admin Use

posted 12-15-2014 11:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YELLER CAT     send a private message to YELLER CAT   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by YELLER CAT
#1 YES
V8 standard
No options
FastLane

POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Florida
Registered: Nov 2014
Admin Use

posted 12-17-2014 09:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for FastLane     send a private message to FastLane   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by FastLane
#3
Poor Richard


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Far Hills, New Jersey, USA
Registered: Aug 2013
Admin Use

posted 12-24-2014 07:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Poor Richard     send a private message to Poor Richard   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Poor Richard
If the v8 was an option....of course....I purchased mine only for the "look", was well aware that it was not a performance vehicle. I enjoy looking at it more than driving it!
Chi_Town_Prowler

POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Chicago, IL
Registered: Aug 2004
Admin Use

posted 01-13-2015 03:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Chi_Town_Prowler     send a private message to Chi_Town_Prowler   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Chi_Town_Prowler
This V8 versus V6 argument will probably go on FOREVER. I'm actually surprised its still an issue.

For the record, I bought the car for the advanced styling and not for brute performance or acceleration.
So I'M HAPPY WITH THE V6.

When Buick was developing the Grand National in the early 80s, they actually had the same issues as Chrysler: going with a V6 over a V8. Although Buick still had the tooling, they hadn't used a production V8 in years and they definitely didn't have a hi-po V8. It was cheaper and easier to work with what they had, the V6. Especially in a limited production car.
The V6 was lighter and easier to work with and develop.

By the time I bought my first Grand National in 1986, NOBODY EVER SAID, "GEE TOO BAD IT DOESN'T HAVE A V8"!!

And I NEVER hear anyone say about all of the (now classic) European and Japanese cars like the Porsches, Aston Martins, MGs, Celicas, 240z and many others; 'GEE, TOO BAD THEY DON'T HAVE V8S"!!!
MANY of those NON V8 cars are WORTH A FORTUNE TODAY.

The Prowler is a fun, zippy, quick car with ENOUGH performance to handle most of what pulls next to it on the street. And that 3.89 rear gear IS NO JOKE. I've PERSONALLY EMBARRASSED MANY A NON BELIEVER.

But the TRUE SHAME RESTS WITH CHRYSLER: Its a SHAME that the ONLY HI-PO part offered for the Prowler was the exhaust system. None of the parts or development on the white "ISCREAM" Prowler were offered aftermarket by Chrysler.
Even the NEON, PT CRUISER AND DODGE OMNI HAVE HIGH PERFORMANCE FACTORY MOPAR PARTS.
That's my ONLY complaint with the car. THAT FACTORY HI-PO PARTS WERE NOT AN OPTION.

padroo



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Chesterton, IN, USA
Registered: Dec 2010
Admin Use

posted 01-13-2015 03:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for padroo     send a private message to padroo   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by padroo
If it wasn't built in the image of a Hot Rod maybe it would never have been an issue. Hot Rods have V-8's, the bigger the better.

If the Prowler were built today with a modern V-6, what kind of HP would it have with variable valve timing and direct fuel injection and maybe a turbo. Normally aspirated V'6 engines in the Mustang and Camaro of today all put out over 300 HP.

AZ NGOSH8R
Prowler Enthusiast

From:Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Registered: Dec 2006
Admin Use

posted 01-13-2015 04:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AZ NGOSH8R     send a private message to AZ NGOSH8R   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by AZ NGOSH8R
Happy with the performance of mine. I have other cars with high hp engines. I like the dependability of the Prowler, 10 years and only one tow needed.
REBELBOB


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Pamplin, VA
Registered: Mar 2001
Admin Use

posted 01-14-2015 12:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for REBELBOB     send a private message to REBELBOB   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by REBELBOB
The unfortunate thing is that when Paxton was doing the supercharger they did not make it more cost friendly...we wanted the performance and bit the bullet and had the supercharger installed. It has embarrassed many Mustang and "Muscle Car" owners and gives the V-6 all the horsepower that I need and am glad we had it installed.
I still think this would have been a great "option" for Chrysler. If I could find a dependable turbo option I would love to do that to Carol's car.
RPL




POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Rochester Hills, MI, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 01-14-2015 01:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RPL     send a private message to RPL   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by RPL
The problem with the Paxton kit was two fold. First, low volume to spread their development and engineering costs. The second was a production change in exhaust manifolds that drove them to add headers rather than re-engineer there installation kit. Prowler owners first saw the headers during Larry Lord's Route 66 event.

Chrysler did explore offering the Paxton kit. A change in engine controls for the 2002 MY added full range multiple miss-fire detection. The earlier cars did not pickup multiple miss-fire at WOT. The 2002's with a Paxton tend to throw a MIL light at WOT. The decision to end production early canceled the 2003 model run and any chance to add power.


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are CT (US)  Top of Page  Previous Page

 Return to General Prowler Discussion  next newest topic | next oldest topic



Administrative Options: Close Topic |Make Sticky | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Prowler Online Homepage

All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
E-Innovations, LP

POA Terms of Service