Home Page | Owners Registry | Discussion Forums | ProwlerMall | Event Scrapbooks | About |
Click here to return to the Prowler Online Board Main Page |
ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum
General Prowler Discussion Should it have had a V8? (Page 3)
|
Bottom of Page This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Should it have had a V8? |
Michael Pond POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Canon City, Colorado |
posted 12-06-2014 05:33 PM
LOVE THAT SOUND(MUSIC)!! |
mslc10 POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Bulverde, Texas, United States |
posted 12-10-2014 07:14 PM
Yep that's how it should have sounded..........but I still dig what it is! |
Me Time Prowler Junkie From: NJ. USA |
posted 12-12-2014 08:29 AM
Back when the Prowler was built the V8's didn't have much more HP so the V6 was the clear answer for many reasons. It still is IMO, the Prowler isn't meant to be a pure burner but more a touring car with some get up and go. |
luch POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Newmarket Ontario Canada |
posted 12-12-2014 09:34 AM
yes |
drbutton | POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Canon City, CO, USA |
posted 12-12-2014 11:54 PM
I have heard this argument about the V8 and the Prowler for years, long before I bought a Prowler. My vote is for #2, the V6. Guys can bench race all day, but keeping up with the exponential performance arms race of the last 15 years would have overwhelmed the stock Prowlers no matter what Chrysler would have put under the hood. I did not buy mine to race, or impress people with the power. I bought the Prowler for the fine car that it is, and I like driving it more than any of my prior V8 cars. |
beachcat BANNED From:Ontario, Canada |
posted 12-13-2014 06:45 AM
Whenever I hear someone say "nice car but should have had more power" (I hear that a lot!), I always say "have you ever driven one?". The answer is always "NO". Then I say, "well if you had, you likely wouldn't be saying that". I usually get an embarrassed look in return. It's my way of letting them know that they don't have the info they need to say what they are saying. On the street and off the line, the Prowler has very respectable performance.My buddy has a 625 HP Malibu and he was shocked when we had short challenge, off the line. Unless you go to the track, you can't legally do much more with any car, anyway. The overwhelming majority on this thread have responded "NO". That's because we have all driven one and we get it. With any car, you have to look at the entire package. All cars can be picked on in some way, including the price tag and value retention. When you look at the whole Prowler package, it's a real winner. Take the haters for a ride and blow their minds. |
ProwlerFanUK Prowler Enthusiast From:South Otterington, England |
posted 12-15-2014 06:36 AM
Yes, of course!!! |
padroo POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Chesterton, IN, USA |
posted 12-15-2014 08:16 AM
I really can't think of too many cars that people sell and then buy another one just like the one they had. Corvette is likely the most common example though. |
alrtg POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Westminster, MD, USA |
posted 12-15-2014 10:14 AM
quote: For me there have been a few vehicles that I bought, liked, and purchased another one (or more) Corvair, both early and late model. I have had a dozen or so over the years, still have one and sort of looking for another. Impala, two '61 Bubble tops, I also had a '65 for about a week then gave it to a friend. S-10 Pick up, First generation. I am on my third one now and have had it for 18 years. I would consider another if it was the right one. Lebaron, I have had two of these ('90 & '92 V6 convertibles) and liked them very much. This is another that I would own another of, again if the right one came along. |
YELLER CAT POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:FLORIDA, USA |
posted 12-15-2014 11:15 AM
#1 YES V8 standard No options |
FastLane POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Florida |
posted 12-17-2014 09:14 AM
#3 |
Poor Richard POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Far Hills, New Jersey, USA |
posted 12-24-2014 07:40 AM
If the v8 was an option....of course....I purchased mine only for the "look", was well aware that it was not a performance vehicle. I enjoy looking at it more than driving it! |
Chi_Town_Prowler POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Chicago, IL |
posted 01-13-2015 03:50 PM
This V8 versus V6 argument will probably go on FOREVER. I'm actually surprised its still an issue. For the record, I bought the car for the advanced styling and not for brute performance or acceleration. When Buick was developing the Grand National in the early 80s, they actually had the same issues as Chrysler: going with a V6 over a V8. Although Buick still had the tooling, they hadn't used a production V8 in years and they definitely didn't have a hi-po V8. It was cheaper and easier to work with what they had, the V6. Especially in a limited production car. By the time I bought my first Grand National in 1986, NOBODY EVER SAID, "GEE TOO BAD IT DOESN'T HAVE A V8"!! And I NEVER hear anyone say about all of the (now classic) European and Japanese cars like the Porsches, Aston Martins, MGs, Celicas, 240z and many others; 'GEE, TOO BAD THEY DON'T HAVE V8S"!!! The Prowler is a fun, zippy, quick car with ENOUGH performance to handle most of what pulls next to it on the street. And that 3.89 rear gear IS NO JOKE. I've PERSONALLY EMBARRASSED MANY A NON BELIEVER. But the TRUE SHAME RESTS WITH CHRYSLER: Its a SHAME that the ONLY HI-PO part offered for the Prowler was the exhaust system. None of the parts or development on the white "ISCREAM" Prowler were offered aftermarket by Chrysler. |
padroo POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Chesterton, IN, USA |
posted 01-13-2015 03:58 PM
If it wasn't built in the image of a Hot Rod maybe it would never have been an issue. Hot Rods have V-8's, the bigger the better. If the Prowler were built today with a modern V-6, what kind of HP would it have with variable valve timing and direct fuel injection and maybe a turbo. Normally aspirated V'6 engines in the Mustang and Camaro of today all put out over 300 HP. |
AZ NGOSH8R Prowler Enthusiast From:Phoenix, Arizona, USA |
posted 01-13-2015 04:24 PM
Happy with the performance of mine. I have other cars with high hp engines. I like the dependability of the Prowler, 10 years and only one tow needed. |
REBELBOB POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Pamplin, VA |
posted 01-14-2015 12:05 PM
The unfortunate thing is that when Paxton was doing the supercharger they did not make it more cost friendly...we wanted the performance and bit the bullet and had the supercharger installed. It has embarrassed many Mustang and "Muscle Car" owners and gives the V-6 all the horsepower that I need and am glad we had it installed. I still think this would have been a great "option" for Chrysler. If I could find a dependable turbo option I would love to do that to Carol's car. |
RPL POA Lifetime Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Rochester Hills, MI, USA |
posted 01-14-2015 01:07 PM
The problem with the Paxton kit was two fold. First, low volume to spread their development and engineering costs. The second was a production change in exhaust manifolds that drove them to add headers rather than re-engineer there installation kit. Prowler owners first saw the headers during Larry Lord's Route 66 event. Chrysler did explore offering the Paxton kit. A change in engine controls for the 2002 MY added full range multiple miss-fire detection. The earlier cars did not pickup multiple miss-fire at WOT. The 2002's with a Paxton tend to throw a MIL light at WOT. The decision to end production early canceled the 2003 model run and any chance to add power. |
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 All times are CT (US) Top of Page Previous Page | Return to General Prowler Discussion next newest topic | next oldest topic |
All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
E-Innovations, LP