Home Page | Owners Registry | Discussion Forums | ProwlerMall | Event Scrapbooks | About |
Bottom of Page | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Are you Unemployed? |
heynow14 POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Waterford,Mi USA |
posted 07-01-2010 10:54 PM
How do you feel now that the repugs filibustered extending unemployment benefits? ------------------ |
ALLEY CAT POA Lifetime Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:mesa, az, USA |
posted 07-02-2010 08:06 AM
Good move on their part. One year is long enough to provide unemployment benefits, in most cases. If you can't get employment within one year,,,,,go look in the mirror, you'll most likely see somebody who doesn't want to work in the first place (ala, Detroit ilk, etc.). If your state wants to provide longer benefit times,,fine, let your state pick up the additional tab. |
St0rmBr1nger Prowler Junkie From:san diego |
posted 07-02-2010 09:28 AM
quote: They never should have extended it in the first place. Personal responsibility is gone |
BeWare POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Acworth , Georgia , USA |
posted 07-02-2010 09:41 AM
My question is. Where is the money coming from? We are so deep in debt right now its ridiculous. The current extension to November is going to increase the deficit by $33.3 billion. |
BeWare POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Acworth , Georgia , USA |
posted 07-02-2010 02:21 PM
Dems refuse compromise to extend unemployment benefits By: Susan Ferrechio Chief Congressional Correspondent July 2, 2010
Democrats have been painting Republicans as unsympathetic to the long-term unemployed who will be unable to collect benefits, but Democratic leaders have rejected several offers by the GOP to vote for the bill if at least some of it is paid for. "My concern is that the Democrats are more interested in having this issue to demagogue for political gamesmanship than they are in simply passing the benefits extension," said Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, who offered a deal that was rejected by Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. Democratic leaders were quick to attack Republicans for opposing the benefits, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., calling their opposition "just cruel" and "contrary to what our country is about." Republicans, meanwhile, stood firm in their argument that extending benefits should not add to the deficit. Voinovich told Reid he would vote for extending benefits if at least half of the extension could be paid for with unused money from the $787 billion stimulus package. "I came to the table with a fair compromise, and the ball is in their court," said Voinovich, whose state suffers from a 10.7 percent unemployment rate. The House passed a sixth-month extension on Thursday, but the Senate was long gone by then, having shut down early so that the late Sen. Robert Byrd's body could lie in repose in the chamber. Any future action by the Senate will have to wait until lawmakers return on July 12. On Wednesday, the Senate rejected a measure to extend benefits, with most Republicans and one Democrat, Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., opposed to the bill because it would add more than $33 billion to the nation's $1.3 trillion deficit. The Senate came up just one vote short of passage, with Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, Maine Republicans, voting yes. After the bill failed, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., offered a compromise that would extend benefits for two months and pay for it fully with unused stimulus funding. But Reid turned it down. "The only reason the unemployment extension hasn't passed is because Democrats simply refuse to pass a bill that doesn't add to the debt," McConnell said. "That's it. That's the only difference between what they've offered and what we've offered." McConnell pointed out that earlier this month, 57 Democrats voted for an amendment offered by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., that would also have used stimulus money to pay for some of the benefits. The amendment fell three votes short of the 60 needed for passage, but Reid was among the supporters. Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin, D-Ill., told The Washington Examiner on Thursday that unemployment benefits are considered emergency spending and do not fall under the same rules requiring them to be offset. "We've never done it," Durbin said. "And it is counterintuitive that to stop a recession we have to take spending away from one area and put it into another. We need to put money into the economy."
|
dskatt POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Denham Springs, Louisiana , USA |
posted 07-02-2010 06:08 PM
I know a young woman who lost her job as a receptionist. She earned $500 per week at her job. She draws $300 per week in unemployment benefits. When you take into account travel expenses and childcare, she makes about as much now as she did at her job. She plans to milk it for as long as possible. She's not even looking. |
CJ POA Lifetime Site Supporter Prowler Junkie Personal ScrapBook From:Rochester Hills, MI USA |
posted 07-03-2010 11:35 PM
quote: There is a LOT of that going on and the taxpayers who do work are paying for that. Why should they find a job when they're getting more that what they might get with a job? |
Randy Cobb POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Greensboro, NC |
posted 07-06-2010 07:50 AM
I have a relative who is milking the system. Fakes jobs seeking and openly admits to taking unemployment benefits as long as they are offered and not taking a job. Been out of work for 2 years. This message has been edited by Randy Cobb on 07-06-2010 at 07:51 AM |
BeWare POA Site Supporter Prowler Junkie From:Acworth , Georgia , USA |
posted 07-06-2010 10:34 AM
In June, the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) was unchanged at 6.8 million. These individuals made up 45.5 percent of unemployed persons In June, about 2.6 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, an increase of 415,000 Among the marginally attached, there were 1.2 million discouraged workers in June, up by 414,000 |
All times are CT (US) Top of Page Previous Page | Return to Political Off Topic next newest topic | next oldest topic |
All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
E-Innovations, LP