Home Page Owners Registry Discussion Forums ProwlerMall Event Scrapbooks About

Click here to return to the Prowler Online Board Main Page
  ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum
  General Prowler Discussion
  Increased Performance (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
edit profile | register | preferences | faq | search

   Bottom of Page
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Increased Performance
RPL





POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Rochester Hills, MI, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 03-20-2024 06:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RPL     send a private message to RPL   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by RPL
I see all of this talk about how to increase the performance of the 3.5L engine. I know what works and what doesn't. I once task Roush Performance to get me 300 HP. They couldn't by normal means. They could boost it by 50HP but that didn't deliver 300HP at the flywheel. One improvement suggested was increasing plenum volume which was the advice an owner in Grand Junction followed. Headers, cold air inlet and modifying the PCM didn't add 10HP. The gear set changes axle ratio and improves acceleration but doesn't increase power.

One that I know works is using the crank out of the 4.0L SOHC engine used in the minivans. It increases the stroke from 81MM to 91MM sharing the same 96MM bore. You can also offset grind the stock crank and use a Honda small pin race rod. I like the 4.0L crank because the one I found was a twisted forging. Displacement increases, but the key is increased torque from the longer stroke. With the new pistons, there are some new ring sets available.

I can tell you that the stroker engines were fun to drive. I'd like to hear some thoughts about this.

ALLEY CAT






POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:mesa, Arizona, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 03-20-2024 06:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ALLEY CAT     send a private message to ALLEY CAT   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by ALLEY CAT
Bob,,, Can you now tell us what Jerry did to the R @ D, white test Prowler to make it seem so much more powerful?

Jerry was so tight lipped about it,,, understandably so back then as a DC employee.

Stray Cat





POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Dayton, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2002
Admin Use

posted 03-20-2024 08:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Stray Cat     send a private message to Stray Cat   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Stray Cat
Bob,

I do not know how to make them more powerful. I do know that I have researched all this lately and it seems that the intake could (Emphasis on Could) possibly produce 3 to 4 HP. Headers look like they produce 4 to 6 HP. Exhaust and Free flow Muffler/Cats etc. ? 5 HP maybe ? So you have a 7% increase if you do them all. My question is, is that RWHP or Flywheel when people say "Headers add 5 HP". Then gears really wake the car up.

Do the higher temp Plugs do anything ?
Does Higher Octane fuel do anything ?

This I do know. Mufflers, Intake and Headers DO make a difference in the way they sound. And gears like you say, increase acceleration which helps you to get a wicked 2nd gear scratch. Which makes it just flat out fun.

I would think that all the 6 things above, gears, Intake, Headers, Exhaust, Good fuel and hotter plugs would be a way to drive more power. Like I said, no proof, but proof in the way the thing sounds and behaves on hard acceleration.

John

Richnew41



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Wind Gap , PA, United States
Registered: Feb 2015
Admin Use

posted 03-20-2024 09:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Richnew41     send a private message to Richnew41   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Richnew41
My brother has an 01’ Orange and about 10 years ago he had a Paxton Supercharger installed…They had a very difficult time getting it tuned right but in the end it delivered 50hp to the rear wheels on the Dyno. Amazingly, it’s still running very well all these years later. Honestly, I thought it would have destroyed the engine in the long run but appears I was wrong….
I forgot what company was supplying them specifically for the Prowler but 1 of those things lost in history I guess….
Personally, I’m so humbled when I see and hear the things that can be done and just astonished by the level of knowledge everyone has….
I just shake my head and say to myself, I should of learned more when I was young…
WildCat






POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie
Personal ScrapBook

From:Oldest kid in the neighborhood..... East side Indy, Indiana, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 03-20-2024 11:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for WildCat     send a private message to WildCat   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by WildCat
Very interesting to read this

I never seen the engine in I Scream, but heard stories or speculation

With the 4.3 & 5.0 strokers that were built it would be interesting to read just how they came about & what was done to control the programming for them

I read a lot on Facebook of people thinking they can do a few mods & make major improvements, would think what was done by many performance specialists back in the day that were unsuccessful & that today someone must have found a miracle performance shop


Improving Prowler Performance isn’t & easy or simple precess

Tony has the best solution

------------------
Larry Mayes

cdeluca99


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Patchogue, NY, USA
Registered: Mar 2020
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 04:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cdeluca99     send a private message to cdeluca99   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by cdeluca99
Another way to get the car a little faster is making it lighter. Factory wheels and tires weigh a ton for starters. Unsprung weight is a hp killer. My 20x15 wheels have hollow spoked centers it was an expensive upgrade but they don’t weigh half as much as the factory setup even with an 18” wide tire. Never mind the front tires and wheels, might weigh a quarter of the factory setup. I love how my car runs I believe I have done everything possible to make her as light as possible. My hi-boy body was set up very very thin barely.125” thick it’s very very light. It’s definitely not night and day putting her on a diet but every little bit helps. Headers,full exhaust,plugs,coils cold air intake and gears definitely didn’t hurt anything either 😉 I do have plans for nitrous oxide shot in the coming weeks.

This message has been edited by cdeluca99 on 03-21-2024 at 05:19 AM

UKRAINE2001


From:Kiev, Europe, Ukraine
Registered: Apr 2020
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 05:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for UKRAINE2001     send a private message to UKRAINE2001   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by UKRAINE2001
crank 4.0-liter EGS engine
quote:
Originally posted by RPL:
I see all of this talk about how to increase the performance of the 3.5L engine. I know what works and what doesn't. I once task Roush Performance to get me 300 HP. They couldn't by normal means. They could boost it by 50HP but that didn't deliver 300HP at the flywheel. One improvement suggested was increasing plenum volume which was the advice an owner in Grand Junction followed. Headers, cold air inlet and modifying the PCM didn't add 10HP. The gear set changes axle ratio and improves acceleration but doesn't increase power.

One that I know works is using the crank out of the 4.0L SOHC engine used in the minivans. It increases the stroke from 81MM to 91MM sharing the same 96MM bore. You can also offset grind the stock crank and use a Honda small pin race rod. I like the 4.0L crank because the one I found was a twisted forging. Displacement increases, but the key is increased torque from the longer stroke. With the new pistons, there are some new ring sets available.

I can tell you that the stroker engines were fun to drive. I'd like to hear some thoughts about this.


CaptainJackSpeed

From:Memphis, TN, USA
Registered: Mar 2024
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 07:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainJackSpeed     send a private message to CaptainJackSpeed   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by CaptainJackSpeed
I was excited to see this thread and am looking for the extra 100 HP too.
Over the next year I'll be collecting parts for an upgrade to the engine. I like the 4.0 stroker idea. Big stroke engines pull hard and its awesome. The flathead Ford V-8 in my Roadster has 3.750 stroke and up to 4.5" strokes are available for that engine.
4 valve engines have little power below 4,000 rpm. My 1.8L Mazda Miata is the same. Above 4,000 it turns on the power.
For the 3.5 I'm starting with a used lower intake manifold and ported and polished the ports. Am wanting a set of used heads for the same purpose. Will post pix of the intake when I get home later today.
Supercharging/Turbos/Stroker are the way. Its the only method to increase bottom end power. Any engine with larger stroke than bore size will be a hard charger. The Hudson Hornet 6 had a 4.5" stroke and it was beating Hemis in dirt racing way back bespite being a flathead inline six cyl.
Another example is the Packrd Merlin engine from WW-2. Single OHC, 4 valve engine. Bore 5.4", stroke 6.0".
I love engine talk. 4th generation motorhead here
RPL





POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Rochester Hills, MI, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 07:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for RPL     send a private message to RPL   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by RPL
Lighter is faster. A hundred-pound reduction is a tenth of a second in the quarter mile. Headers put the PCM at risk because of localized heat, but can be shielded. The "cold air inlets" actual drop HP because they are picking up hotter under hood air. The stock inlet pulls air from the cooling right side A-pillar. We proved that on Kenne-Bells chassis dyno.

Iscream had a 3.8L stroker with a welded, off-set ground crank. Plus, Jerry had a unique throttle body set up and the car had a number of other unique features including Prowler Pro gears. My 3.8L engine ended up in John Davies car by mistake. You might ask him how the car ran. He had it out to the drag strip a number of times before I got the engine back.

The 3.8's and 4.2's were done with off-set ground cranks and different rod and piston combinations. The 5.0L that I was involved in had the cylinder liners bored out and the block sleeved along with on off-set ground 4.0L crank using small pin Honda race rods. It was roughly 4 1/8 x 4 1/8. The issue with the larger displacements is tuning the PCM. Back then it took an iBox to tune. Tony can do that today.

The supercharger was from Paxton. CJ drove the first one with the new Paxton headers on Larry Lord's Grand Canyon trip right off the floor from the SEMA Show. Her California Kid car has a Paxton supercharger. The heat shield that Larry Lord offers for the PCM was designed on her car.

Correct range spark plugs, not hotter plugs. Yes, premium fuel makes more power in Prowler. Why, because the engine monitors spark-knock and optimizes timing for each cylinder based on combustion. The Prowler and 300C were tested with premium fuel and rated at 253HP. The 3.5L Intrepid was tested with regular fuel and rated at 241HP. Does increasing octane beyond 93 increase power in a stock engine, the answer is no. Tuning is optimized for 91/93.

So, what did I miss?

cdeluca99


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Patchogue, NY, USA
Registered: Mar 2020
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 07:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cdeluca99     send a private message to cdeluca99   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by cdeluca99
Very cool!! Thank you for all that, I copied it into my files I have a quick question for you tho because I know you seen em all. Which is your fave? 3.8, 4.0, 4.2, 5.0? You are going to make me find a boneyard engine and build a Frankenstein engine by picking your brain lol These are the threads I LOVE!! Actually looking for a core engine now

This message has been edited by cdeluca99 on 03-21-2024 at 08:00 AM

CaptainJackSpeed

From:Memphis, TN, USA
Registered: Mar 2024
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 08:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainJackSpeed     send a private message to CaptainJackSpeed   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by CaptainJackSpeed
PS, I see engine swaps as a bad idea. It means giving up and taking the easy way out. Chrysler gave us a good baseline. I'm certain all us gear head/motor heads can find a way to get what we want out of it.
The 4.0 crank seems to be a great way to do it. A stroke of 100 or 110mm and H-beam rods would be fantastic.
CaptainJackSpeed

From:Memphis, TN, USA
Registered: Mar 2024
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 08:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainJackSpeed     send a private message to CaptainJackSpeed   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by CaptainJackSpeed
RPL sounds like our man!
Dick Henry


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:South Padre Island, TX, USA
Registered: Oct 2020
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 08:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dick Henry     send a private message to Dick Henry   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Dick Henry
Well after reading all this it seems the cheapest modification I can do to increase performance in my car is to get back to my High School body weight of 160 lbs. I already have the headers, gears, & mufflers. My car is surprisingly quick for what it is. I don’t know anyone who wouldn’t want more performance but not at the cost of dependability. I hate having issues & being stranded on the side of the road. This is a great thread however. I look forward to hearing what people have done.
Tchootch

POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Brandon Twp, MI, USA
Registered: Jul 2023
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 11:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tchootch     send a private message to Tchootch   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Tchootch
It seems to me to be a lot of effort, and probably expense, for 50HP. Not that I am against power and performance. I have always opted for the higher performance/larger engined variants of cars where available. Powerful cars are always more satisfying to drive, even around town.

I remember reading that the weakest link in the Prowler drivetrain, is the transaxle. Gearbox updates, as detailed in another recent thread should, maybe, be considered along with engine mods.

I'm no engine expert, but the modifying of an engine always seems like a more elegant solution for power rather than simply bolting on forced induction. Although, I can see the attraction.

With the stroker case, I assume shorter connecting rods are also required with the longer crank. Is any machining of the block face required to maintain the deck height? Compression ratio would also get a bump from longer stroke. Has anybody done any work on the cylinder heads of these engines? Like what size valves work well, where to remove material for improved gas flow? I'm guessing it's not a popular engine used in racing.

What about dropping in a Pentastar engine, has that been attempted? 305BHP from the 3.6L. Big job I imagine, new engine mounts likely plus fabricating an adapter for the transaxle. Again, all for 50bhp and not much boost in torque.

Just a few thoughts. Tell me where I'm going wrong.

CaptainJackSpeed

From:Memphis, TN, USA
Registered: Mar 2024
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 12:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainJackSpeed     send a private message to CaptainJackSpeed   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by CaptainJackSpeed
When I worked for RHS (Racing Head Service) and Comp Cams back in the early 80's the rule of thumb about spark plug heat ranges was to use cooler plugs for HP, supercharged/turbo engines and hotter plugs for worn out engines that burned oil.
The further the electrode protrudes into the chamber, the hotter the plug.
Using A/C as a basis, R42 are the coolest, R49 the hottest. The cooler plugs increase milage a little.
As for fuel, I read an interesting book about the post war Cleveland Air Races. In the back was a chapter on fuel octane. Oddly enough, the higher the octane, the slower the fuel burns. Back then the military was using Shell 115/145 "Purple Gas". This was rated at 115 octane in a lean mixture
and 145 in a rich condition. The base for the fuel was Tetraethyl Lead. Lead lubicated the valve seats and valves. Unleaded fuel removes this benefit. For the 1948 and 49 Season, the last race (1949), Shell introduced "Triptane", a highly volitile gasoline with a rating of 200/300. I can't remember the composition. But it burned so slowly that a backfire on Dick Becker's Super Corsair under high boost blew off the air scoop. They had to turn the ignition timing way up to get it under control. My uncle and dad were pioneer hot rodders during the 1940's and 50's. My dad would take me with him in one of the hot rods to the Ammoco station during the early 1970's to fill up with Purple Gas and get 5 gallons in the can. During Vietnam, the military still operated piston engine aircraft but were phasing out. (C-123, A-26A, T-28, and others). They dumped the huge surplus Purple on the market to get rid of it in certain gas stations.
The is from the WMUKA "world's most useless knowledge archive" part of my brain. But if anyone is interested in fuel octane, its part of the story.
padroo




POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Chesterton, IN, USA
Registered: Dec 2010
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 12:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for padroo     send a private message to padroo   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by padroo
When I went to aviation school back in the mid 70's there was a whole section on AV gas. A lot of our instructors were old WWII veterans in aviation. We were told a lot of theory and the one I remember that higher octane is a slower burning fuel. Aviation was a big pioneer in superchargers on these big old WWII aircraft. Under all that boost they needed a slower burning fuel to control detonation.
Ross L

From:Eldorado, AR, US
Registered: Nov 2017
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 12:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross L     send a private message to Ross L   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Ross L
I have a dealer installed Paxton Novi 1000 on my Prowler. We’ve put about 5k miles on it since we bought it a few months ago. Came with headers, and aftermarket mufflers. Haven’t had any issues. Supposed to pick up about 100hp. Edit, saw this post geared toward stroker set ups… sorry.

This message has been edited by Ross L on 03-21-2024 at 12:41 PM

Tomcal



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2005
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 01:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tomcal     send a private message to Tomcal   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Tomcal
All you ever wanted to know about Gas and Octane......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

CaptainJackSpeed

From:Memphis, TN, USA
Registered: Mar 2024
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 02:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainJackSpeed     send a private message to CaptainJackSpeed   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by CaptainJackSpeed
I wish we could see that superchager installation. I think I remember seeing your car for sale last year, is that right?
Maybe 2 yrs ago? And then you bought it afterwards?
Supercharger or turbo with intercooler is the best solution I think.
Lately the best engine on the market in my thoughts is the 2.3l and 3.5l ecoboost. When I first got the car I was thinking 3.5l ecoboost swap.
Direct injection and twin turbo would change everything on the chrysler 3.5. My wife has a 2021 Explorer with the 2.3l. It weighs 4,600 lbs empty and the first time I drove it was a shocker. It has so much low end power for a small 4 banger. I can only imagine the 3.5l ecoboost in the Prowler.... Would be incredible.
Ross L

From:Eldorado, AR, US
Registered: Nov 2017
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 02:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross L     send a private message to Ross L   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Ross L
Probably was mine. Didn’t meet reserve on BAT. I offered him significantly more $$$ than highest bid and glad I did! I’m In process of adding an air to air intercooler under the car. Has a piggyback controller to retard timing and fuel two additional injectors. Not ideal, but it works!
Ross L

From:Eldorado, AR, US
Registered: Nov 2017
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 02:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross L     send a private message to Ross L   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Ross L

Hard to really see much.

Ross L

From:Eldorado, AR, US
Registered: Nov 2017
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 02:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross L     send a private message to Ross L   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Ross L
I agree with you. With a turbo you could have full boost by 3000 rpm’s vs 6500rpms with the Paxton. Tuning is the biggest roadblock , needs much larger injectors and better timing control. Then there’s packaging…. A turbo Prowler on E85(flex fuel sensor would be ideal) and 15psi would be nice! 400+hp would be easy with such a set-up.

This message has been edited by Ross L on 03-21-2024 at 02:58 PM

RPL





POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Rochester Hills, MI, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 03:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RPL     send a private message to RPL   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by RPL
CaptainJackSpeed So you worked with my friend Scooter....
Ross L

From:Eldorado, AR, US
Registered: Nov 2017
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 03:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross L     send a private message to Ross L   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by Ross L
Scooter, was he the guy who set up the BAT auction? I never had any direct contact with him. Gary was the owners name. I was working on a deal before he tried the auction. We worked the deal out after auction ended.
CaptainJackSpeed

From:Memphis, TN, USA
Registered: Mar 2024
Admin Use

posted 03-21-2024 03:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainJackSpeed     send a private message to CaptainJackSpeed   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by CaptainJackSpeed
I did! Ole Scooter's dad dated my dad's older sister right after WW-2. Scooter ran the race engine dept at RHS and Dean Harvey with him.
I worked there 83-87. Then Joe Lunati from 87-88. I learned a lot from those guys. Ivars Schmeltniks and John McWherter owned the place at the time. I ported the heads and intake for Ivars' 34 Ford with a DeSoto Red Ram hemi in it.
Lynn Jones "ole Peanut" was the best port guy around. Last I heard he got Lou Gherigs and passed on. I was just a dumb kid when I started there, driving a Model A Ford hot rod my dad, grandfather and uncle built 1956-58. My brother has it now. Small world.... How do you know Scooter? Did you know Skeeter???

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are CT (US)  Top of Page  Previous Page

 Return to General Prowler Discussion  next newest topic | next oldest topic



Administrative Options: Close Topic |Make Sticky | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Prowler Online Homepage

All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2020

POA Terms of Service