posted 05-28-2016 08:41 PM                  

Prowler Enthusiasts Currently Browsing the Board (101)
mslc10, silverkat, jwallis, alprowl, 401KAT, Weezy, 69Cat, beachcat, DrillinU, Skullrodder, ed monahan, Dsmith6, phil2237, jjprowler, drbutton, lionberger, Wayne Finch, garysss, Marathonservice1, and 82 guests

posted 05-29-2016 04:56 PM                  

After you pi$$ off the restaurant owner ..... I wonder what it's like looking through the window of his establishment, watching everyone else dine on fine food.

Sometimes Karma's a bitch .... or in this case a beach !!!!!

posted 05-31-2016 05:24 PM                  

quote:

---

Originally posted by padroo:
Some people had trouble with Beachcat and some didn't. I for one have bought from him more than once and like some others on this site was a valuable source of information and I always considered him a friend. You did not agree with him on many topics and that is fine but you should be happy you got him banned and now is the time to let it go. J M H O.

---

Padroo...He got HIMSELF banned. He alone is responsible for his actions.I had nothing to do with his actions/reactions with myself or others that caused the ban. All I did was to just post a question ,asking if others had issues with him.
I also was the first to post " move on" once he did get banned.I too have purchased items from him and he was considered by myself as very informative and helpful.

The "stirring of the pot" was in response to seeing his screen name on the Online list, nothing more ,nothing less. My post was of curiosity and purely cordial.

And to those who are telling me not to post the "beachcat sighting" again ,"worried about Houston" or whatever else you were implying...
I don't know if you were trying to silence me ,reprimand me, or just caution me....but it left me uncomfortable!

posted 05-31-2016 05:51 PM                  

quote:

---

Originally posted by mslc10:
Padroo...He got HIMSELF banned. He alone is responsible for his actions.I had nothing to do with his actions/reactions with myself or others that caused the ban. All I did was to just post a question ,asking if others had issues with him.
I also was the first to post " move on" once he did get banned.I too have purchased items from him and he was considered by myself as very informative and helpful.

The "stirring of the pot" was in response to seeing his screen name on the Online list, nothing more ,nothing less. My post was of curiosity and purely cordial.

And to those who are telling me not to post the "beachcat sighting" again , or whatever else they were implying...
I don't know if you were trying to silence me ,reprimand me, or just cautioning me....but it left me uncomfortable!

---

I didn't take it as stirring the pot, I just posted my thoughts about him while the subject was brought up. I am OK with you and I meant no harm.