Home Page Owners Registry Discussion Forums ProwlerMall Event Scrapbooks About
NEW... Back by popular demand... Here is a forum where you can express your political thoughts. As with the main off topic forum, please remain civil and keep it clean and friendly.
In order to see all of the threads in this forum, set your date view in the upper right corner to "show all topics"

Click here to return to the Prowler Online Board Main Page
  ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum
  Political Off Topic
  Republicans fight to keep tax breaks

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
edit profile | register | preferences | faq | search

   Bottom of Page next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Republicans fight to keep tax breaks
reechee




POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:San Rafael, CA
Registered: Dec 2007
Admin Use

posted 08-17-2014 09:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for reechee     send a private message to reechee   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by reechee
Republicans fight to keep tax breaks for companies moving jobs overseas

Senate Republicans once again showed their stellar values by filibustering a bill that would have cut corporate tax breaks for moving jobs overseas. That's right, Republicans are fighting to keep giving companies money to move jobs out of the United States:

"Today in the United States, any time an American company closes a factory or plant in America and moves operations to another country, the American taxpayers pick up part of that moving bill," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "Frankly, a vote against this bill is a vote against American jobs."

Republicans called the bill an election-year stunt. They noted that Democrats tried to pass a similar bill two years ago, right before the last congressional elections.

Okay, Republicans, let's say it's a stunt! It's a stunt that has now repeatedly revealed your desire to keep giving companies tax breaks for killing jobs in America. Are we supposed to see the "stunt" nature of bringing up a bill like this every two years or so as equivalent in moral bankruptcy to defending the existing crappy policy? How is this a political defense?

The bill would also have given tax breaks to companies that move their operations to the United States.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/30/1317847/-Republicans-fight-to-keep-tax-breaks-for-companies-moving-jobs-overseas#comments

------------------
If money is speech why can't I pay my taxes with words?

ed monahan





POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie
Personal ScrapBook

From:Cincinnati, Oh, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 08-17-2014 09:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ed monahan     send a private message to ed monahan   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by ed monahan
It is Sunday and they are on the Summer break.
Other than that, it is probably right on the money.
bjprowler


POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Clarksville,Ohio,USA
Registered: Oct 2004
Admin Use

posted 08-18-2014 08:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bjprowler     send a private message to bjprowler   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by bjprowler
Hmmmmmm......How come the article doesn't reference or provide a link to the specific bill they are referring to??????

I guess the sheeple who read this KOS rag don't need to read the contents of the actual bill for themselves......Just some vague reference to finger pointing by Harry Reid is all they need to know.

Lets see the link to the bill in question please.

This message has been edited by bjprowler on 08-18-2014 at 08:18 AM

jimsutton



POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Ocala, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2008
Admin Use

posted 08-18-2014 09:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jimsutton     send a private message to jimsutton   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by jimsutton
I would like to see it also ..
BeWare





POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:Acworth , Georgia , USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 08-18-2014 09:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for BeWare     send a private message to BeWare   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by BeWare
Once again its the Democrats its out way or the Highway stand causing non cooperation. And once again "Dirty" Harry Reid's fingerprints are all over it. And why did the Democrats wait until another election year to bring this up again?


Republicans block Senate bill that would curb tax breaks for firms moving operations overseas
Article by: STEPHEN OHLEMACHER , Associated Press
Updated: July 30, 2014 - 3:41 PM

WASHINGTON — Republican senators blocked an election-year bill Wednesday to limit tax breaks for U.S. companies that move operations overseas.

The bill would have prohibited companies from deducting expenses related to moving their operations to a foreign country. It also would have offered tax credits to companies that move operations to the U.S. from a foreign country.

The Senate voted 54-42 to end debate on the bill, six short of the 60 votes needed to advance it. The White House says President Barack Obama supports the legislation.

"Today in the United States, any time an American company closes a factory or plant in America and moves operations to another country, the American taxpayers pick up part of that moving bill," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "Frankly, a vote against this bill is a vote against American jobs."

Republicans called the bill an election-year stunt. They noted that Democrats tried to pass a similar bill two years ago, right before the last congressional elections.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said the bill is "designed for campaign rhetoric and failure, not to create jobs here in the U.S."

Republicans also complained that Reid wouldn't allow any amendments. The legislation now joins a growing number of bills that have stalled in the Senate this year because Democrats and Republicans couldn't agree on amendments.

The bill would have cost U.S. companies that move overseas $143 million in additional taxes over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which analyzes tax legislation for Congress. Companies moving into the U.S. would have seen their tax bills drop by $357 million over the same period.

The difference — $214 million — would have been added to the budget deficit.

The White House and some Democrats in Congress have been making the case that a growing number of U.S. corporations are using international tax loopholes to avoid paying U.S. taxes.

On Wednesday, Obama criticized U.S. companies that reincorporate overseas as a way to lower their U.S. tax bills. Many of these companies keep most of their operations in the U.S., including their headquarters.

The process, called an inversion, allows firms to shield more of their foreign earnings from being taxed in the U.S.

"You know, they are renouncing their citizenship even though they're keeping most of their business here," Obama said in a speech in Kanas City, Missouri.

"They shouldn't turn their back on the country that made their success possible," Obama added.

Some Democrats in Congress have been pushing legislation to make it harder for U.S. firms to reincorporate overseas mainly to avoid U.S. taxes.

Republicans say that instead of punishing corporations for leaving the U.S., Congress should make America's tax laws more inviting so more firms will want to come here.

At 35 percent, the U.S. has the highest corporate income tax rate in the industrialized world. Many corporations, however, pay lower tax rates because the law is filled with many credits, deductions and exemptions.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/269225651.html

Also you can see the bill here. There is nothing that I can find in the bill that would also have given tax breaks to companies that move their operations to the United States as stated in the Daily Kos article.

http://democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/bill/hr4679-stop-corporate-inversions-act-2014

ALLEY CAT





POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:mesa, az, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 08-18-2014 10:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ALLEY CAT     send a private message to ALLEY CAT   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by ALLEY CAT
"WASHINGTON — Republican senators blocked an election-year bill Wednesday ,,,,,,,"

"The Senate voted 54-42 to end debate on the bill, six short of the 60 votes needed to advance it."


The Dimwits control the U.S.Senate, and can expect a 55 to 45 vote advantage on nearly all bills up for vote,,,,,so how is it the Repubs' fault for the bill failing to advance when the vote was 54-42?

I'd say it was the Dims fault that the bill failed to get a majority vote,,,not the Repubs......since 9 Dems voted against, and 4 other Dems didn't vote. Still,,,,they were not going to get the 60 votes needed to advance.

This message has been edited by ALLEY CAT on 08-18-2014 at 10:47 AM

reechee




POA Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:San Rafael, CA
Registered: Dec 2007
Admin Use

posted 08-18-2014 01:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for reechee     send a private message to reechee   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by reechee
On Wednesday, the Senate voted 54-42 to end debate on S. 2569, the Bring Jobs Home Act — 60 votes were needed to advance the measure.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/213780-republicans-block-bill-to-end-tax-breaks-for-outsourcing#ixzz3AlhW9NQr
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook


AC, in the senate, majority is not sufficient. Because of their rules, you really need a super majority to advance a bill.

ALLEY CAT





POA Lifetime Site Supporter
Prowler Junkie

From:mesa, az, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
Admin Use

posted 08-18-2014 02:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ALLEY CAT     send a private message to ALLEY CAT   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Search for more posts by ALLEY CAT
Yes,,,,,as I stated in my last sentence of my post:

quote: "Still,,,,they were not going to get the 60 votes needed to advance."

All times are CT (US)  Top of Page  Previous Page

 Return to Political Off Topic  next newest topic | next oldest topic



Administrative Options: Close Topic |Make Sticky | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Prowler Online Homepage

All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
E-Innovations, LP

POA Terms of Service