Author
|
Topic: Poor grieving Cindy....
|
Snoman unregistered Posts: 36093 From: Mesa, Az Registered: JUL 2000
|
posted 10-09-2005 08:11 AM
Tough Life. . . . . . .camping outside Bush's Ranch More about Cindy . . What is most interesting to me is that the press gives this little bunch of people who are protesting with Cindy so much air time without discussing Cindy's background. This is a case of more press bias. It has been pointed out on just a couple of media outlets that Cindy divorced her first husband and left her son with him to be raised while she became a political activist for the Democratic Party. She had very little to do with her son in his growing years. She remarried. The 1st husband remarried. The original father raised the son with his new wife. They miss their son and mourn the loss of his life. They have stated that they are very proud of their son and that they agree with the stance of America in Iraq and on terror. They said that their son was eager to serve and to go fight the terrorists in Iraq. He volunteered. How many news stations carried their interview? Not many. So the son dies in Iraq and then Cindy shows up to make a stink. She gets an audience with Bush. That was not enough. She goes to Crawford and demands another audience. How many news stations carry the ongoing saga of Cindy? Practically all of them. Cindy didn't care about her son. She let another woman raise him. Cindy doesn't care about the other soldiers in Iraq. Cindy cares about her liberal, feminist agenda and about using the death of her son to lobby against Republicans and Bush. And the press is helping her. Why? Then, a few days ago, Cindy's 2nd husband filed for a divorce from Cindy. Cindy sounds like a feminist opportunist who did not have the sense of responsibility to even raise her own son. It looks like her 2nd husband is fed up with Cindy. We middle Americans should be fed up with Cindy also. We should be fed up with the press. They manipulate us into their "group think" and into the responses that they want on their polls. H. A. Brown
|
halicat unregistered Posts: 36093 From: Mesa, Az Registered: JUL 2000
|
posted 10-09-2005 08:25 AM
funny, some folks just don't see her motive... its all about her claim to fame...nothing more... where is the coverage by the media on all the hero's and people that really contribute to the good in our society ?? oh.. I forgot ... thats boring and not worth much to the buzzards in the newsroom.
|
Lone Ranger Prowler Junkie Posts: 2120 From: Sedalia Mo USA Registered: MAY 2003
|
posted 10-09-2005 06:21 PM
Enough with this woman. She is a disgrace.
|
mannyd Prowler Junkie Posts: 94 From: port charlotte,Fl., charlotte Registered: FEB 2003
|
posted 10-09-2005 11:31 PM
I tell you, Rush Limbaugh bashed Cindys daylights on his program. At first I felt uncomfortable with this until I found out what she was all about
|
ETMIDZT Prowler Junkie Posts: 2278 From: Spring Lake, Mi. USA Registered: JUL 2000
|
posted 10-10-2005 06:29 AM
She is pharisaical!!
|
Pantera Prowler Junkie Posts: 1216 From: Connecticut Registered: NOV 2004
|
posted 10-10-2005 07:07 AM
You guys should check with snopes.com before you post an internet story...most are false or only partially true.From Snopes: Claim: Cindy Sheehan's son, Casey, was raised by her ex-husband after the couple divorced and both remarried. Status: False. The piece quoted above, criticizing Ms. Sheehan's alleged lack of involvement in her son's upbringing after divorcing his father, is something fabricated out of whole cloth, evidently the product of someone's confusing a completely different family with the Sheehans. Cindy Sheehan and her husband, Patrick, were high school sweethearts who wed while both were in their early 20's and who have been married to each other for over 28 years. (Neither has ever been married to anyone else.) The couple had four children together, of whom Casey was the oldest. Both parents raised Casey together, first in the southern California community of Norwalk and later in the northern California town of Vacaville, where the Sheehans moved when Casey was 14.
There is more on Snopes.com about her and her recent divorce.
|
BeWare Prowler Junkie Posts: 18511 From: Acworth,GA,USA Registered: JUL 2000
|
posted 10-10-2005 08:11 AM
I am sorry for her loss but I think this has always had less to do with that than her need for attention. She is losing any credibility she may have had very quickly. Even the Democrats are turning on her now. Except for the extreme left, she has lost a lot of support.
|
Bcoffman Gray Ghost Prowler Junkie Posts: 2418 From: Marshall,Mo.65340 Registered: DEC 2002
|
posted 10-10-2005 04:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by Pantera: You guys should check with snopes.com before you post an internet story...most are false or only partially true.From Snopes: Claim: Cindy Sheehan's son, Casey, was raised by her ex-husband after the couple divorced and both remarried. Status: False. The piece quoted above, criticizing Ms. Sheehan's alleged lack of involvement in her son's upbringing after divorcing his father, is something fabricated out of whole cloth, evidently the product of someone's confusing a completely different family with the Sheehans. Cindy Sheehan and her husband, Patrick, were high school sweethearts who wed while both were in their early 20's and who have been married to each other for over 28 years. (Neither has ever been married to anyone else.) The couple had four children together, of whom Casey was the oldest. Both parents raised Casey together, first in the southern California community of Norwalk and later in the northern California town of Vacaville, where the Sheehans moved when Casey was 14.
There is more on Snopes.com about her and her recent divorce.
I'm glad to see you post this. I had seen the story circulated before. I try to just read these and delete. Rather than send them on. The few times I have forwarded stories like this, invariably it turns out they are just made up. To me, it is sad that people will read stuff like that and then repeat it later as fact. It really doesn't say much for us humans, does it?
|
Snoman unregistered Posts: 2418 From: Marshall,Mo.65340 Registered: DEC 2002
|
posted 10-10-2005 05:43 PM
I didn't even read this before I posted it.Stuff like this is good for a few laughs when reading replys.I dont like what this women is doing nor do i like her stand on a lot of things but thats another story.
|
ed monahan Prowler Junkie Posts: 33595 From: Cincinnati, OH Registered: JUL 2000
|
posted 10-10-2005 08:33 PM
I just "Snoped" Snopes and found out that the site never tells the truch. Oh well! Everyone is all upset about Pres. Dubya appointing Meirs to the Supreme Court. About 8 years ago Clinton appointed Susan Dlott to the 6th Circuit. She had no experience. She got the job SOLELY because she was married to Stan Chesley who raised MILLIONS for Clinton. There was not a big hubbub then.
|