Archive: With Election Day Fast Approaching ... - ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum

Note: This is an archived topic. It is read-only.

ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum

Off Topic

With Election Day Fast Approaching ... (Page 2)

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

profile | register | preferences | faq | search

This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2
This topic was originally posted in this forum: Tires, Rims Discusssion

Author	Topic: With Election Day Fast Approaching ...
Ray unregistered Posts: 5359 From: San Jose Ca Santa Clara Registered: JUL 2000	posted 10-04-2004 11:19 AM Ponder this ... If this is wrong please let me know. As far as I can remember it seems right to me. I'm trying to get all this political stuff straightened out in my head so I'll know how to vote come November. Right now, we have one guy saying one thing. Then the other guy says something else. Who do we believe? Lemme see; have I got this straight? Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good... Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad... Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good.. Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - bad... Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good... Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad... Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists- good... Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad... Clinton bombs Chinese embassy - good... Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad... Clinton commits felonies while in office - good... Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - bad... No mass graves found in Serbia - good... No WMD found Iraq - bad... Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - good... Economy on upswing under Bush - bad... Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good... World Trade Centers fall under Bush - bad... Clinton says Saddam has nukes - good... Bush says Saddam has nukes - bad... Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good... Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad... Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good... Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad... Milosevic not yet convicted - good... Saddam turned over for trial - bad... Ahh, it's so confusing! Every year an independent tax watchdog group analyzes the average tax burden on Americans, and then calculates the "Tax Freedom Day". This is the day after which the money you earn goes to you, not the government. This year, tax freedom day was April 11th. That's the earliest it has been since 1991. Its latest day ever was May 2nd, which occurred in 2000. Notice anything special about those dates? Recently, John Kerry gave a speech in which he claimed Americans are actually paying more taxes under Bush, despite the tax cuts. He gave no explanation and provided no data for this claim. Another interesting fact: Both George Bush and John Kerry are wealthy men. Bush owns only one home, his ranch in Texas. Kerry owns 4 mansions, all worth several million dollars. (His ski resort home in Idaho is an old barn brought over from Europe in pieces. Not your average A-frame). Bush paid $250,000 in taxes this year; Kerry paid $90,000. Does that sound right? The man who wants to raise your taxes obviously has figured out a way to avoid paying his own. Pass this on. Election Day is fast approaching.
pumpkin Prowler Junkie Posts: 7907 From: Las Cruces, NM, USA Registered: DEC 2001	posted 10-04-2004 12:00 PM Sounds good to me.
CJ Prowler Junkie Posts: 18860 From: Rochester Hills, MI USA Registered: JUL 2000	posted 10-04-2004 05:20 PM Interesting comparisons.........
twistedjester Prowler Junkie Posts: 106 From: las vegas Registered: JUN 2003	posted 10-04-2004 05:41 PM Hello I'm with an independent polling party If you knew that Al Gore had an illegitimate black child would you be more or less likely to vote for him? If you knew that George W. Bush donated $250,000 to charity would you be more or less likely to vote for him? these are the tactics of the one you want as president now isn't it. The memnetics are strong within you ray but why wait 'till now to point out our hypocrisy? The reason people have a problem with the new Halliburton contracts is because King Bush II get money from them. I'm just going to summarize the whole Iraq thing:AFGHANISTAN was harboring the al queida not Iraq. in the first 3 years of King Bush II he lost 250000 jobs but has recently created 75000 good on him, his total gain is about -175000 jobs but lets not argue semantics, RIGHT? it doesn't actually matter they are both horrible candidates so ignore all this propaganda and vote for the lesser of 2 evils or take the high road and go with nader its your vote don't let someone else decide for you.
YellowFever unregistered Posts: 106 From: las vegas Registered: JUN 2003	posted 10-04-2004 07:17 PM quote: Originally posted by twistedjester: Hello I'm with an independent polling party If you knew that Al Gore had an illegitimate black child would you be more or less likely to vote for him? If you knew that George W. Bush donated $250,000 to charity would you be more or less likely to vote for him? these are the tactics of the one you want as president now isn't it. What is all that tripe about? And exactly who said any of that? The memnetics The what???????? are strong within you ray but why wait 'till now to point out our hypocrisy? Pssst. I think folks have been pointing it out for years. Like serving in the miliary, not important with Clinton, means everything against President Bush. The reason people have a problem with the new Halliburton contracts is because King Bush II get money from them. What a load of CRAP. Any proof other then ranting? If he got a dime from them you don't think Dan Blather wouldn't be all over it in a New York second???????? Part of why Halliburton got some contracts is because...well, they are the only company in THE WORLD that does what they do. Want to know who is a major stockholder in Halliburton? Tereza Heinz Kerry. Perhaps this is why they don't pooh-pooh Halliburton so much, nes pah? I'm just going to summarize the whole Iraq thing:AFGHANISTAN was harboring the al queida not Iraq. Uh, right and wrong. Yes, they were there BUT, they were also in Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, the Phillipines, Spain, Russian, USA, ad. nauseum. in the first 3 years of King Bush II he lost 250000 jobs but has recently created 75000 good on him, his total gain is about -175000 jobs but lets not argue semantics, RIGHT? Why not at least get the figures right. One, he was handed a recession. Two, there was nothing he did to loose jobs unless a tax cut for EVERYONE cost jobs. Three, think 9/11. Alot of folks started reassessing their lives, not buying homes, cars, etc. It was a ripple effect that no one could have foreseen. The U.S. Department of Labor announced the creation of 112,000 new jobs in June 2004, offering further proof that President Bush's pro-growth economic policies are working. The announcement marks the tenth consecutive month of job creation, for a total of 1.5 million new jobs since last Summer. A tad bit off from your numbers ay Skippy? John Kerry's own advisers have said his proposals won't create jobs and won't stop outsourcing. His plans for higher taxes and new spending will halt our economic growth and destroy jobs, and his own advisers have said that he can't pay for all his new spending, which means higher taxes on all Americans. it doesn't actually matter they are both horrible candidates so ignore all this propaganda and vote for the lesser of 2 evils or take the high road and go with nader its your vote don't let someone else decide for you. That's the high road? Vote for a catatonic visionless guy who is not on the ballot of most states? Do you even know what is platform is (other then to halt production of the Corvair)????
Old Yellow Prowler Junkie Posts: 88 From: Hagerstown,Md. USA Registered: AUG 2002	posted 10-04-2004 07:37 PM Is Clinton running again?
MDProwler Prowler Junkie Posts: 5250 From: Fallston,MD USA Registered: JUL 2003	posted 10-04-2004 07:48 PM OK so I won't vote for Clinton. But I won't vote for Bush either. Bush owns only one home.......ON 7000 ACRES!
Ray unregistered Posts: 5250 From: Fallston,MD USA Registered: JUL 2003	posted 10-04-2004 09:04 PM Wanna guess which private citizen owns the most land aside from the National Park serives? And his wife is a HUGE democrat supporter ...
Dustis unregistered Posts: 5250 From: Fallston,MD USA Registered: JUL 2003	posted 10-04-2004 09:16 PM .......'down here' we call 'em the TED ! That's the one ??
MDProwler Prowler Junkie Posts: 5250 From: Fallston,MD USA Registered: JUL 2003	posted 10-04-2004 09:16 PM Is it trivia time?lol
CTProwler Prowler Junkie Posts: 3915 From: Sherman CT USA Registered: NOV 2002	posted 10-04-2004 09:46 PM I'm not voting!!! I want to make it close!!!! ------------------
Ray unregistered Posts: 3915 From: Sherman CT USA Registered: NOV 2002	posted 10-04-2004 10:21 PM quote: Originally posted by Dustis: .......'down here' we call 'em [B]the TED ! That's the one ?? [/B] You betchya ... and raises Bison to boot (ate some at his restaurant in Nashville). Guess some just don't like trivia OR politics ... oh well.
blackcat Prowler Junkie Posts: 1744 From: atlanta, ga Registered: JUL 2000	posted 10-04-2004 10:57 PM quote: Originally posted by Ray: Wanna guess which private citizen owns the most land aside from the National Park serives? And his wife is a HUGE democrat supporter ... Ray, I don't think they're married any longer.........
ALLEY CAT Prowler Junkie Posts: 36093 From: Mesa, Az Registered: JUL 2000	posted 10-04-2004 11:01 PM I like the polls that still show undecided voters. Who are these morons? Have they been living under a rock the past six months? Obviously, they can't decide anything for themselves and are just plain stupid, IMO.

This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2 All times are CT (US)	This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it!

	Hop to:

Contact Us | Prowler Online Homepage

All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
E-Innovations, LP

POA Terms of Service