|
ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum
Off Topic Assault rifle ban UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
profile | register | preferences | faq | search
|
This topic was originally posted in this forum: Tires, Rims Discusssion |
Author | Topic: Assault rifle ban |
YellowFever unregistered Posts: 133 |
posted 09-27-2004 09:08 AM
O.K., Kerry jumps all over the chance to slam President Bush about the lapse in the assault rifle ban. Then, for some magazine coming out in October, he is asked what his favorite gun is. He claims it to be the M-16 which he used to save his life and his commrades. He went on to say that he does not own one of those BUT, he owns a Chinese communist AK-70 assault rifle. WTF??? He's for the ban, yet he has one of the rifles he is all for banning and that had been banned???? I guess bans are only good for us common folk......... |
pumpkin Prowler Junkie Posts: 7907 |
posted 09-27-2004 09:35 AM
Whats new. ------------------ More 'Pumpkin' photos . . . . . More cars and other stuff New pictures in Personal Scrapbook (02/23/03) "The Prowler is not a car to go from Point A to Point B. The Prowler is the Point!" |
butchcee Prowler Junkie Posts: 7476 |
posted 09-27-2004 10:47 AM
The whole bill is BS. It's not about banning assault weapons, it's just the start of an attempt to ban all guns. Assault weapons play a part in a small % of crime. The radical Violence Policy Center states: "The public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns vs. semiautomatic assault weapons - anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun - can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons." Fully automatic machine guns were, of course, effectively banned in 1934. The value of my pre-ban AR15 just went down with the non-renewal of the ban. Lets see what happens after the election and if Bush caves to the pressure. YF,I think he must have an AK 47. The flip-flop doesn't surprise me coming from Kerry. I wonder if he's even aware of what he says? This message has been edited by butchcee on 09-27-2004 at 10:51 AM |
YellowFever unregistered Posts: 7476 |
posted 09-27-2004 10:56 AM
quote: I agree completely and yes, it was an AK-47 (not sure what I was thinking of). Thx |
Dave Mills Prowler Junkie Posts: 5419 |
posted 09-27-2004 11:23 AM
Personally, I see no reason why the general public should need a fully automatic or even a semi automatic weapon for other than collecting. |
butchcee Prowler Junkie Posts: 7476 |
posted 09-27-2004 11:39 AM
quote: Agreed on the full automatic Dave. What about semi automatic shotguns and hand guns? |
YellowFever unregistered Posts: 7476 |
posted 09-27-2004 12:20 PM
quote: Here is my take on it. 1) Guns don't kill, people do; |
RED5 Prowler Junkie Posts: 2167 |
posted 09-27-2004 01:12 PM
I agree The ban is useless, and really only makes illegal certain mods or accesories to your gun. |
CJ Prowler Junkie Posts: 18860 |
posted 09-27-2004 01:47 PM
quote: That's because he already has one. |
Dave Mills Prowler Junkie Posts: 5419 |
posted 09-27-2004 05:29 PM
I have one son in Federal Law Enforcement and he has often come upon the situation where the Special Agents are outgunned, so I guess my view is a little one-sided. |
YellowFever unregistered Posts: 5419 |
posted 09-27-2004 06:53 PM
quote: Agreed but, if you ban all guns, those thugs will still have them and will still get them like they do with illegal drugs. Banning something only keeps it out of the hands of honest citizens that abide by the rules. |
Dave Mills Prowler Junkie Posts: 5419 |
posted 09-27-2004 07:01 PM
YF: Don't get me wrong, I am not in favor of a gun ban. The government has stepped on us enough all ready, I just think there is a point where you don't have to shoot someone 10 or 12 times to make it effective. |
Xray Prowler Junkie Posts: 181 |
posted 10-30-2004 09:00 PM
Just like Kerry the Ban " was " a waste of tax payers dollars. |
RBADKAT Prowler Junkie Posts: 583 |
posted 10-30-2004 10:25 PM
Consideration for not having all the facts on status of owning a AK-47 needs to be given here. I don't see here that any one has specifically stated that the weapon is fully functional. |
Ray unregistered Posts: 583 |
posted 10-30-2004 10:42 PM
quote: Just curious RBADKAT, my wife and I were talking this evening about Kerry and the military and HER feelings are that all Military personnel (vets and current inlisted/officers) should be FOR him based on his time in Vietnam ... are YOU? Just wondering as I totally disagreed with her ... |
Thunder Prowler Junkie Posts: 456 |
posted 10-30-2004 11:07 PM
Still don't get why these weapons of war need to be available to the general public. Who do you anticipate using these weapons against.....each other? Also makes legit gun owners more of a target for thieves. Its all about money for the gun manufacturers....just like everything else......money! |
CJ Prowler Junkie Posts: 18860 |
posted 10-31-2004 01:15 AM
quote: It's not about owning an AK-47......it's about the right to own one.......or any other weapon. |
RBADKAT Prowler Junkie Posts: 583 |
posted 10-31-2004 01:14 AM
Ray, I don't think that he being a Veteran and or a Veteran of the Vietnam war should be the only reason to be for or against a Presidential Candidate. ( I guess that means that I agree with you, hope I don't get the MRS. mad at me). My comments were not intended to promote pro or con support for Kerry. I was just making an observation on why some one can say they own an assault weapon and still be against them. I feel confident that we all have access to same media and press and or quality sources and are intelligent enough to make our own decision on who to support. No need for me to add add my 2 cents.
|
butchcee Prowler Junkie Posts: 7476 |
posted 10-31-2004 01:38 AM
Ray--here's a link to a site I belong to. http://groups.msn.com/VeteransofTuyHoaPhuHiepandVungRoBay/general.msnw Let your wife read what my VietNam brothers feel about Kerry. Here's another link to where I served. Check out the Vet's photos if you like. I have a load of pictures posted from my 67-68 tour...Al Chianelli http://www.geocities.com/thmoon96819/index.htm F. KERRY |
idive Prowler Junkie Posts: 8483 |
posted 10-31-2004 07:29 AM
quote: We, as a nation, can amend, and have amended our constitution. That said, there are some that we CANNOT change. As the constitution states, the right of the people to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON. Sounds clear to me... |
halicat unregistered Posts: 8483 |
posted 10-31-2004 07:50 AM
here in canada they are trying to force us to register ALL our guns... single shots, 22's, the whole works...what a joke ! mine aren't registered and never will be... most of my friends feel the same way , some have even hidden or buried some ...i would much prefer banning all handguns... 10 year term for anyone possesing one and leave the long gun owners alone... my sweet sixteen browning autoloader is mine left to me by my dad, and not the governments to tell me what to do with...my home is defended by a louisville slugger, the autoloader is for back up ! batter up ! |
ALLEY CAT Prowler Junkie Posts: 36093 |
posted 10-31-2004 08:32 AM
Al - thanks for posting that link to your Vietnam War photos. What touched me was the 'forgotten names'. Names can easily be forgotten, but their faces and dedication to unit shall always remain with you. Thanks for sharing.
As for Kerry, I would consider him a war criminal for taking his position as a anti-war protestor upon his arrival back to the states,,,,while still a member of the armed services. Claiming that his 'brothers' over there were killing at random innocent men, women, and children was totally uncalled for,,,,traitor. As an officer while there, if he personally seen such activity, why didn't he report it to command at that time? He is so full of BS!!! |
butchcee Prowler Junkie Posts: 7476 |
posted 10-31-2004 09:01 AM
Larry-- I just found my old unit 3 months ago. I've been in touch with a few people and it's great reliving the experience and filling in the blanks that have been forgotten over the years. I came back 150 lbs with a 30 waist. |
kat hunter Prowler Junkie Posts: 1049 |
posted 10-31-2004 07:14 PM
The First Amendment guarantees the right of free speech. We all know this right is slowly being eroded. There are things we can be arrested for just by saying them. The Second Amendment guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This amendment helps to protect the rights given to the people in the first amendment. If today we allow the banning of assault weapons ( joke ban to start with), tomorrow it will be pistols or all semi-auto weapons, next it will be high powered rifles, then all hunting rifles and on and on till all guns are banned for law abiding citizens. Then the first amendment would be next. History shows us cases of this with Hitler, Castro, Ida Amin (the examples I think are correct if memory serves correctly). I'm sure there others. More recently with Canada and Australia with their bans studies have shown increases in armed home invasion when the family is home (criminals have nothing to fear). We need to be extremely careful with the rights we allow the government to take away because after all it's not something I care about or like doing. Eventually they will get to something you care about. A couple of examples I can come up with. Private vehicles at all, unnecessary, you should be using public transportation. (I've heard this one from someone the is currently getting a lot of press coverage right now, who is flying around the country in his own personal jet and driving around in his family's SUV's. I'll get off my soap box now. Just something to think about. |
All times are CT (US) | This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it! |
All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
E-Innovations, LP
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c