Note: This is an archived topic. It is read-only.
  ProwlerOnline, Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler Discussion Forum
  Off Topic
  Assault rifle ban

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

profile | register | preferences | faq | search



This topic was originally posted in this forum: Tires, Rims Discusssion
Author Topic:   Assault rifle ban
YellowFever
unregistered

Posts: 133
From: East Peoria, IL. USA
Registered: SEP 2004

posted 09-27-2004 09:08 AM           
O.K., Kerry jumps all over the chance to slam President Bush about the lapse in the assault rifle ban.

Then, for some magazine coming out in October, he is asked what his favorite gun is. He claims it to be the M-16 which he used to save his life and his commrades.

He went on to say that he does not own one of those BUT, he owns a Chinese communist AK-70 assault rifle.

WTF??? He's for the ban, yet he has one of the rifles he is all for banning and that had been banned????

I guess bans are only good for us common folk.........

pumpkin
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 7907
From: Las Cruces, NM, USA
Registered: DEC 2001

posted 09-27-2004 09:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for pumpkin     
Whats new.

------------------

Current mods: Mopar dual exhaust & front mudflaps; MacMotorsports Air Intake;
Real Rod Air Patrol; Graphics by Balistek Designs; ($8) Chrome grille; Chrome
tire valve-stem covers; Painted rear bumper lettering; Prowler Pro Gears; Synthetic
Oil; Raybestos Ceramic Brake Pads; TGF Door Panel Inserts & Headrest Covers;
SheepskinExpress Sheepskin Seatcovers; Grille Light; Pinstriping by Bo Boring;
Painted Valve Cover; Window Tinting; Windshield Visor Banner; Front Bumper
Removal / Relocation of Front Turn Signal Lights; Real Rod Transmission Cooler
Cover, Sill and Carpet Covers, Aero Front Covers and Roadster Rear Pan, rear
bumpers removed; rear mudflaps; painted calipers; Prowler Products by Gary
Drilled Rotors, front and rear; Painted tach; Jay's Aluminum Billet Center Caps
w/shimmers, Chrome Lugnuts and Chrome Radio Bezel Shimmer; Dash Rings;
Windshield Wiper Arm Removal; Fender Trim; Speaker Replacement; Painted
Plenum; Painted Radiator Crossmember; Painted Rear Mudflaps; Air Patrol
graphics; Aluminum engine compartment support bars; PlasmaGlow 7-color LED
Underbody Kit; Dash Designs Dash Mat; Airbrushed Rear Trim Panel and Painted
Headlight Caps.

More 'Pumpkin' photos . . . . . More cars and other stuff

New pictures in Personal Scrapbook (02/23/03)

"I may have to grow older, but I do not have to grow up!"

"The Prowler is not a car to go from Point A to Point B. The Prowler is the Point!"

butchcee
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 7476
From: Lake Ariel, Pa.
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 09-27-2004 10:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for butchcee     
The whole bill is BS. It's not about banning assault weapons, it's just the start of an attempt to ban all guns. Assault weapons play a part in a small % of crime.

The radical Violence Policy Center states: "The public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns vs. semiautomatic assault weapons - anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun - can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons." Fully automatic machine guns were, of course, effectively banned in 1934.

The value of my pre-ban AR15 just went down with the non-renewal of the ban. Lets see what happens after the election and if Bush caves to the pressure. YF,I think he must have an AK 47. The flip-flop doesn't surprise me coming from Kerry. I wonder if he's even aware of what he says?

This message has been edited by butchcee on 09-27-2004 at 10:51 AM

YellowFever
unregistered

Posts: 7476
From: Lake Ariel, Pa.
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 09-27-2004 10:56 AM           
quote:
Originally posted by butchcee:
The whole bill is BS. It's not about banning assault weapons, it's just the start of an attempt to ban all guns. Assault weapons play a part in a small % of crime.

The radical Violence Policy Center states: "The public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns vs. semiautomatic assault weapons - anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun - can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons." Fully automatic machine guns were, of course, effectively banned in 1934.

The value of my pre-ban AR15 just went down with the non-renewal of the ban. Lets see what happens after the election and if Bush caves to the pressure. YF,I think he must have an AK 47. The flip-flop doesn't surprise me coming from Kerry. I wonder if he's even aware of what he says?


I agree completely and yes, it was an AK-47 (not sure what I was thinking of).

Thx



Dave Mills
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 5419
From: Johnstown, PA, USA
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 09-27-2004 11:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dave Mills     
Personally, I see no reason why the general public should need a fully automatic or even a semi automatic weapon for other than collecting.


butchcee
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 7476
From: Lake Ariel, Pa.
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 09-27-2004 11:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for butchcee     
quote:
Originally posted by Dave Mills:
Personally, I see no reason why the general public should need a fully automatic or even a semi automatic weapon for other than collecting.

Agreed on the full automatic Dave. What about semi automatic shotguns and hand guns?



YellowFever
unregistered

Posts: 7476
From: Lake Ariel, Pa.
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 09-27-2004 12:20 PM           
quote:
Originally posted by Dave Mills:
Personally, I see no reason why the general public should need a fully automatic or even a semi automatic weapon for other than collecting.

Here is my take on it.

1) Guns don't kill, people do;
2) No gun should be banned (even automtic ones) from decent law abiding folks;
3) Drugs are illegal, yet you can buy them almost anywhere. What makes you think ANY ban on any gun will keep criminals from getting one? If kilos of cocaine can make it across the border, I'm sure guns can too.



RED5
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 2167
From: USA
Registered: JUN 2004

posted 09-27-2004 01:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RED5     
I agree

The ban is useless, and really only makes illegal certain mods or accesories to your gun.



CJ
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 18860
From: Rochester Hills, MI USA
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 09-27-2004 01:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CJ     
quote:
He's for the ban, yet he has one of the rifles he is all for banning and that had been banned

That's because he already has one.

Dave Mills
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 5419
From: Johnstown, PA, USA
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 09-27-2004 05:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dave Mills     
I have one son in Federal Law Enforcement and he has often come upon the situation where the Special Agents are outgunned, so I guess my view is a little one-sided.


YellowFever
unregistered

Posts: 5419
From: Johnstown, PA, USA
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 09-27-2004 06:53 PM           
quote:
Originally posted by Dave Mills:
I have one son in Federal Law Enforcement and he has often come upon the situation where the Special Agents are outgunned, so I guess my view is a little one-sided.

Agreed but, if you ban all guns, those thugs will still have them and will still get them like they do with illegal drugs.

Banning something only keeps it out of the hands of honest citizens that abide by the rules.



Dave Mills
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 5419
From: Johnstown, PA, USA
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 09-27-2004 07:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dave Mills     
YF: Don't get me wrong, I am not in favor of a gun ban. The government has stepped on us enough all ready, I just think there is a point where you don't have to shoot someone 10 or 12 times to make it effective.


Xray
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 181
From: Huntsville AL US
Registered: OCT 2004

posted 10-30-2004 09:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Xray     
Just like Kerry the Ban " was " a waste of tax payers dollars.


RBADKAT
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 583
From: Green Valley, Arizona, USA
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 10-30-2004 10:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RBADKAT     
Consideration for not having all the facts on status of owning a AK-47 needs to be given here.

I don't see here that any one has specifically stated that the weapon is fully functional.
I say this because I along with a few of my Marine buddy's returned home from Viet Nam with weapons that were allowed to be brought back as war trophies. I returned with a Chinese SKS Semi Automatic, others with me brought back Chinese AK-47's. (The bolts were all welded closed and the the Barrel Lead filled.)
Having a AK-47 doesn't make it functional as well as owning or not owning a weapon doesn't dictate ones political position on GUNS.
I say let ones mouth do the talking for the position they take.
Dan G.


Ray
unregistered

Posts: 583
From: Green Valley, Arizona, USA
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 10-30-2004 10:42 PM           
quote:
Originally posted by RBADKAT:
Consideration for not having all the facts on status of owning a AK-47 needs to be given here.

I don't see here that any one has specifically stated that the weapon is fully functional.
I say this because I along with a few of my Marine buddy's returned home from Viet Nam with weapons that were allowed to be brought back as war trophies. I returned with a Chinese SKS Semi Automatic, others with me brought back Chinese AK-47's. (The bolts were all welded closed and the the Barrel Lead filled.)
Having a AK-47 doesn't make it functional as well as owning or not owning a weapon doesn't dictate ones political position on GUNS.
I say let ones mouth do the talking for the position they take.
Dan G.


Just curious RBADKAT, my wife and I were talking this evening about Kerry and the military and HER feelings are that all Military personnel (vets and current inlisted/officers) should be FOR him based on his time in Vietnam ... are YOU? Just wondering as I totally disagreed with her ...



Thunder
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 456
From: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Registered: FEB 2003

posted 10-30-2004 11:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thunder     
Still don't get why these weapons of war need to be available to the general public. Who do you anticipate using these weapons against.....each other? Also makes legit gun owners more of a target for thieves. Its all about money for the gun manufacturers....just like everything else......money!


CJ
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 18860
From: Rochester Hills, MI USA
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 10-31-2004 01:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CJ     
quote:
Personally, I see no reason why the general public should need a fully automatic or even a semi automatic weapon for other than collecting

It's not about owning an AK-47......it's about the right to own one.......or any other weapon.

RBADKAT
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 583
From: Green Valley, Arizona, USA
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 10-31-2004 01:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for RBADKAT     
Ray, I don't think that he being a Veteran and or a Veteran of the Vietnam war should be the only reason to be for or against a Presidential Candidate. ( I guess that means that I agree with you, hope I don't get the MRS. mad at me).
My comments were not intended to promote pro or con support for Kerry. I was just making an observation on why some one can say they own an assault weapon and still be against them.

I feel confident that we all have access to same media and press and or quality sources and are intelligent enough to make our own decision on who to support. No need for me to add add my 2 cents.


CJ, your right it all about the right to own one.
Our right to bear arms. If we don't like it we ( as in "We the people") need to change it. Until then, we have three views 1)for, 2) against and 3) don't care ( # 3 IS THE ONE THAT SCARE ME)



butchcee
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 7476
From: Lake Ariel, Pa.
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 10-31-2004 01:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for butchcee     
Ray--here's a link to a site I belong to. http://groups.msn.com/VeteransofTuyHoaPhuHiepandVungRoBay/general.msnw
Let your wife read what my VietNam brothers feel about Kerry. Here's another link to where I served. Check out the Vet's photos if you like. I have a load of pictures posted from my 67-68 tour...Al Chianelli http://www.geocities.com/thmoon96819/index.htm

F. KERRY

idive
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 8483
From: Texas USA
Registered: APR 2003

posted 10-31-2004 07:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for idive     
quote:
Originally posted by RBADKAT:
... CJ, your right it all about the right to own one.
Our right to bear arms. If we don't like it we ( as in "We the people") need to change it. Until then, we have three views 1)for, 2) against and 3) don't care ( # 3 IS THE ONE THAT SCARE ME)


We, as a nation, can amend, and have amended our constitution. That said, there are some that we CANNOT change. As the constitution states, the right of the people to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON. Sounds clear to me...


halicat
unregistered

Posts: 8483
From: Texas USA
Registered: APR 2003

posted 10-31-2004 07:50 AM           
here in canada they are trying to force us to register ALL our guns... single shots, 22's, the whole works...what a joke ! mine aren't registered and never will be... most of my friends feel the same way , some have even hidden or buried some ...i would much prefer banning all handguns... 10 year term for anyone possesing one and leave the long gun owners alone... my sweet sixteen browning autoloader is mine left to me by my dad, and not the governments to tell me what to do with...my home is defended by a louisville slugger, the autoloader is for back up !

batter up !

ALLEY CAT
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 36093
From: Mesa, Az
Registered: JUL 2000

posted 10-31-2004 08:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ALLEY CAT     
Al - thanks for posting that link to your Vietnam War photos. What touched me was the 'forgotten names'. Names can easily be forgotten, but their faces and dedication to unit shall always remain with you.
Thanks for sharing.


***********************************************************

As for Kerry, I would consider him a war criminal for taking his position as a anti-war protestor upon his arrival back to the states,,,,while still a member of the armed services. Claiming that his 'brothers' over there were killing at random innocent men, women, and children was totally uncalled for,,,,traitor. As an officer while there, if he personally seen such activity, why didn't he report it to command at that time? He is so full of BS!!!
Received how many purple hearts,,,,but didn't lose a drop of blood! Good thing he didn't have a nose bleed while there! just my 4 cents worth


butchcee
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 7476
From: Lake Ariel, Pa.
Registered: SEP 2000

posted 10-31-2004 09:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for butchcee     
Larry-- I just found my old unit 3 months ago. I've been in touch with a few people and it's great reliving the experience and filling in the blanks that have been forgotten over the years. I came back 150 lbs with a 30 waist.


kat hunter
Prowler Junkie

Posts: 1049
From: central Illinois
Registered: JUL 2003

posted 10-31-2004 07:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kat hunter     
The First Amendment guarantees the right of free speech. We all know this right is slowly being eroded. There are things we can be arrested for just by saying them.

The Second Amendment guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This amendment helps to protect the rights given to the people in the first amendment.

If today we allow the banning of assault weapons ( joke ban to start with), tomorrow it will be pistols or all semi-auto weapons, next it will be high powered rifles, then all hunting rifles and on and on till all guns are banned for law abiding citizens. Then the first amendment would be next.

History shows us cases of this with Hitler, Castro, Ida Amin (the examples I think are correct if memory serves correctly). I'm sure there others.

More recently with Canada and Australia with their bans studies have shown increases in armed home invasion when the family is home (criminals have nothing to fear).

We need to be extremely careful with the rights we allow the government to take away because after all it's not something I care about or like doing. Eventually they will get to something you care about.

A couple of examples I can come up with.
Pleasure boating, GA flying, SUV's. Wastes to much gas so lets ban them or tax them out of existence.

Private vehicles at all, unnecessary, you should be using public transportation. (I've heard this one from someone the is currently getting a lot of press coverage right now, who is flying around the country in his own personal jet and driving around in his family's SUV's.

I'll get off my soap box now. Just something to think about.



All times are CT (US)

This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it!
Hop to:

Contact Us | Prowler Online Homepage

All material contained herein, Copyright 2000 - 2012 ProwlerOnline.com
E-Innovations, LP

POA Terms of Service

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c